Humm, what type of interpretation is my favorite...?

I would have to say that Psychoanalytic theory seems to be the most interesting to me. Anything to do with the way people think about things and why they do interests me. There are so many ways that you can you can study the psychoanalytic theory that they must be categorized under three sub-applications. The application is to study the application of literature on the mind, or studying what some pieces do to the reader's subconscious. The second application is studying systematized set of theories about human behavior, and the third is the effects of literature on illness. There are twenty two different orientations of psychoanalytic theory. The orientations break this theory down much further so that one can study a single little bit of the human mind on literature. They are as follows, Topographic theory, Structural theory, Ego psychology, conflict theory, object relations theory, self psychology, Jacques Lacan/Lacanian psychoanalysis, Interpersonal psychoanalysis, Relational psychoanalysis, Intersubjective psychoanalysis, Topographic theory, Structural Theory, Ego psychology, Conflict Theory, Object relations theory, Self psychology, Jacques Lacan|Lacanian psychoanalysis, Interpersonal psychoanalysis, Relational psychoanalysis, Intersubjective psychoanalysis, and Modern psychoanalysis. I think that the most interesting is topographic theory, more a study of the Pre-conscious and Unconscious. I also like the conflict theory, studying how the mind takes in and understands conflicts and how it shields itself from the harshness. One that is also interesting to me is intersubjective theory, a study of how relationship effect the minds of people and also if they apply those relationships in their life. All of this makes me want to actually get out there and study people reading and see what they are really thinking when reading my favorite fight scene and how it is making them really feel. This would also be very helpful if I could use this on someone who was reading my work. I could see if a part is too emotionally crippling or not powerful enough. All this must be studied under the purest conditions so that nothing else could factor into the results. With these results we can learn so much about people’s minds on books and we can use that to make books more interesting to the reader.